The sensitivity of five audio distortion measurement methods is investigated by experimental measurements on circuits which simulate five basic distortion mechanisms. The results show that the ordinary methods of measuring total harmonic distortion and intermodulation distortion do not reveal dynamic distortions, and that every method has unacceptably low sensitivity for at least one distortion mechanism. The combined use of the dynamic intermodulation method and the two-tone difference frequency method for a complete specification of amplifier distortion is recommended because their "blind spots" do not overlap. Distortion measurements on 11 commercial power amplifiers and 11 operational amplifiers have shown a mixture of the basic distortion mechanisms, mostly dynamic distortions for the operational amplifiers, and mixed static and dynamic distortions for the power amplifiers. In addition, more complex distortion mechanisms have been noted in the power amplifiers. The results obtained by the different methods have been found to correlate qualitatively but not quantitatively for each type of basic nonlinearity separately. For mixed nonlinearities and in the case of commercial amplifiers the qualitative correlation disappears, and there seems to be no reliable way of predicting the measurement results of one method from that of another method.
Click to purchase paper as a non-member or you can login as an AES member to see more options.
No AES members have commented on this paper yet.
To be notified of new comments on this paper you can
subscribe to this RSS feed.
Forum users should login to see additional options.
If you are not yet an AES member and have something important to say about this paper then we urge you to join the AES today and make your voice heard. You can join online today by clicking here.
