This study examines the perceptual effects of bottom channels, i.e., floor-level loudspeakers, within 3D audio reproduction. Two listening tests were undertaken at three different venues, using experienced subjects. Both experiments involved comparing three different versions of seven different musical and nonmusical sound scenes: the original mix with all three vertical loudspeaker layers active (Full), the bottom layer muted (Cut), and the bottom layer downmixed into the main layer loudspeakers (X). Results indicate that listeners could discriminate between the three reproduction conditions with a very high degree of accuracy, particularly when comparing the "Full vs. Cut" and "Full vs. X" conditions. Subjects found that the most salient aspects of the sound scene in terms of differentiating between reproduction conditions were related to low-frequency energy, changes in horizontal and vertical imaging, and timbre/tone. Discrimination ability between reproduction conditions was consistent across all three listener groups, though subjects' perception of the degree of difference between reproduction conditions across various auditory attributes varied between groups. These differences may be related to subjects' previous experience with 3D audio including bottom channels, venue bottom-layer loudspeaker angles of elevation, and venue acoustic conditions.
Authors:
Howie, Will; Martin, Denis; Marui, Atsushi; Kamekawa, Toru Kim, Sungyoung; Aydin, Aybar; King, Richard
Affiliations:
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science International Research Fellow, Tokyo University of the Arts, Tokyo, Japan; Faculty of Music, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Department of Musical Creativity and the Environment, Tokyo University of the Arts, Tokyo, Japan; Graduate School of Culture Technology, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Korea; College of Engineering Technology, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, USA; Graduate Program in Sound Recording, McGill University, Montreal, Canada(See document for exact affiliation information.)
JAES Volume 72 Issue 4 pp. 221-234; April 2024
Publication Date:
April 2, 2024
Download Now (725 KB)
This paper is Open Access which means you can download it for free.
No AES members have commented on this paper yet.
To be notified of new comments on this paper you can
subscribe to this RSS feed.
Forum users should login to see additional options.
If you are not yet an AES member and have something important to say about this paper then we urge you to join the AES today and make your voice heard. You can join online today by clicking here.