Few studies that employ virtual acoustic rendering systems accurately specify motion-to-sound latency. To make such assessments more common, we present two methods for latency measurements using either impulsive or periodic movements. The methods only require hardware available in every acoustics lab: a small microphone and a loudspeaker. We provide open-source tools that implement analysis according to the methods. The methods are evaluated on a high-quality optical tracking system. In addition, three small trackers based on inertial measurement units were tested. The results show the reliability of the method for the optical system and the difficulties in defining the latency of inertial measurement unit-based trackers.
Authors:
Meyer-Kahlen, Nils; Kastemaa, Miranda; Schlecht, Sebastian J.; Lokki, Tapio
Affiliations:
Acoustics Lab, Department of Information and Communications Engineering, Aalto University, 02150 Espoo, Finland; Media Lab, Department of Art and Media, Aalto University, 02150 Espoo, Finland; Acoustics Lab, Department of Information and Communications Engineering, Aalto University, 02150 Espoo, Finland; Media Lab, Department of Art and Media, Aalto University, 02150 Espoo, Finland; Acoustics Lab, Department of Information and Communications Engineering, Aalto University, 02150 Espoo, Finland(See document for exact affiliation information.)
JAES Volume 71 Issue 6 pp. 390-398; June 2023
Publication Date:
June 3, 2023
Click to purchase paper as a non-member or you can login as an AES member to see more options.
No AES members have commented on this report yet.
To be notified of new comments on this report you can
subscribe to this RSS feed.
Forum users should login to see additional options.
If you are not yet an AES member and have something important to say about this report then we urge you to join the AES today and make your voice heard. You can join online today by clicking here.