Community

AES Conference Papers Forum

How much can the number of microphones for 3D audio recording be reduced while maintaining spatial impression?

Document Thumbnail

Many sound recording methods have been proposed for recording 3D audio. Typically, these methods require at least as many microphones as the number of playback channels. In this study, the authors propose an upmixing method for using fewer microphones. Two methods of upmixing are described, one referring to the MS (mid-side) method and the other generating coherent and diffuse sound components. Using the aforementioned up-mixing technique, the 3-AFC method was used to compare the original 20-channel sound with material converted from 5, 7, and 9 channels to 20 channels. The listening test results showed that the proposed method was perceived as “slightly different” compared to the original 20-channel material unless the material contains a great deal of direct sound in the top layers. Furthermore, from the comments received on the comparison with the original 20 channels, converting a 9-channel or 7-channel signal to 20 channels using the proposed method will result in a higher sense of spaciousness and envelopment.

Authors:
Affiliations:
Express Paper 63; AES Convention 154; May 2023
Publication Date:
Subject:

Click to purchase paper as a non-member or you can login as an AES member to see more options.

No AES members have commented on this Spatial Audio yet.

Subscribe to this discussion

RSS Feed To be notified of new comments on this Spatial Audio you can subscribe to this RSS feed. Forum users should login to see additional options.

Start a discussion!

If you would like to start a discussion about this Spatial Audio and are an AES member then you can login here:
Username:
Password:

If you are not yet an AES member and have something important to say about this Spatial Audio then we urge you to join the AES today and make your voice heard. You can join online today by clicking here.

AES - Audio Engineering Society