The Diffuse Field Model (DFM) described in Part 1 is perceptually evaluated in this article. Two experiments were conducted. In first experiment, sound recording professionals rated different treatments of DFM presented on a 20-channel array. This evaluation included the geometric modeling of reflections, strategies involving the early portion of the B-Format Room Impulse Response (RIR), and a comparison between 0th- and 1st-order RIR. Results indicate that it is necessary to model the earliest reflections and to use all four channels of the B-Format room impulse response. In the second experiment, musicians and sound recording professionals were asked to rate DFM and common microphone techniques presented on 3/2 stereophonic setup. DFM was found to be perceptually comparable to the Hamasaki Square technique. DFM approach used in this study is part of a physically-plausible virtual acoustic model for sources that were captured with close microphone placement. This model replaces the panning, delay, and reverberation that would typically be used. DFM is a perceptually viable method to create room impression that allows free placement of anechoic point sources in arbitrary multichannel loudspeaker setups.
Rummukainen, Olli; Romblom, David; Guastavino, Catherine
Affiliations: Aalto University, School of Electrical Engineering, Espoo, Finland; McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Music Media and Technology (CIRMMT), Montreal, Quebec, Canada(See document for exact affiliation information.)
JAES Volume 64 Issue 4 pp. 194-207; April 2016
Publication Date: April 21, 2016
No AES members have commented on this paper yet.
If you are not yet an AES member and have something important to say about this paper then we urge you to join the AES today and make your voice heard. You can join online today by clicking here.