Auditory communication displays within the Next Generation Air Transport System (currently under development in the United States) will likely require an improvements in the user interface for selecting amongst multiple incoming messages. Interface design can impact both user performance and preference. Two design factors were evaluated: physical pressure-sensitive switches versus flatpanel "virtual switches," and auditory feedback from switch contact. Performance with stimuli using physical switches was 1.2 s faster than virtual switches (2.0 s vs. 3.2 s); auditory feedback provided a 0.6 s performance advantage (2.3 s vs. 2.9 s). The subjective results show a significant preference and superior performance for physical pressure-sensitive switches having audio feedback, compared to touch-panel virtual switches. The correlation between objective measures of performance and subjective ratings of preference and performance was shown to be high. Overall, the results indicate that any replacement of physical controls by virtual touch screens must be considered carefully, and should include audio feedback.
Begault, Durand R.; Bittner, Rachel M.; Anderson, Mark R.
Affiliations: Human Systems Integration Division, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA; Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University, New York, NY, USA; ASRC, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA(See document for exact affiliation information.)
JAES Volume 62 Issue 6 pp. 375-385; June 2014
Publication Date: July 2, 2014
No AES members have commented on this paper yet.
If you are not yet an AES member and have something important to say about this paper then we urge you to join the AES today and make your voice heard. You can join online today by clicking here.