Journal Forum

Perceptual Effects of Dynamic Range Compression in Popular Music Recordings - January 2014
4 comments

Accurate Calculation of Radiation and Diffraction from Loudspeaker Enclosures at Low Frequency - June 2013
9 comments

New Measurement Techniques for Portable Listening Devices: Technical Report - October 2013
1 comment

Access Journal Forum

AES Journal Forum

Requirements for Low-Frequency Sound Reproduction, Part I: The Audibility of Changes in Passband Amplitude Ripple and Lower System Cutoff Frequency and Slope

The audibility of changes in passband amplitude ripple and lower system cutoff frequency and slope has been investigated for a loudspeaker system for two situations: a real loud-speaker in an anechoic chamber and a simulated system reproduced via headphones. The signals were standard program material, selected to ensure a sufficient energy content at the relevant frequencies. The experiments were conducted with six subjects with normal hearing using a paired-comparison procedure. The subjects assessed the attributes "lower bass" and "upper bass" in relation to a fixed reference condition. The first experiment investigated the influence of high-pass filter order (second, fourth, and sixth) and lower cutoff frequency (20, 35, and 50 Hz) at three reproduction levels and for four program items. The second experiment examined the influence of amplitude ripple corresponding to four reverberation times at three reproduction levels and for four program items. The results of the first experiment showed that the lower cutoff frequency has a significant influence on the perceived level of lower bass reproduction if the reproduction level is above the hearing threshold in the relevant frequency bands. The influence of high-pass filter order was not significant for the conditions investigated. The results of the second experiment showed that the amplitude ripple has a significant influence on the perceived level of lower and upper bass reproduction. The results also showed that there were no significant differences between the data produced by the two reproduction methods.

Author:
Affiliation:
JAES Volume 50 Issue 7/8 pp. 564-580; August 2002
Publication Date:

Click to purchase paper or you can login as an AES member to see more options.

No AES members have commented on this paper yet.

Subscribe to this discussion

RSS Feed To be notified of new comments on this paper you can subscribe to this RSS feed. Forum users should login to see additional options.

Start a discussion!

If you would like to start a discussion about this paper and are an AES member then you can login here:
Username:
Password:

If you are not yet an AES member and have something important to say about this paper then we urge you to join the AES today and make your voice heard. You can join online today by clicking here.

 
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   Google+   YouTube   RSS News Feeds  
AES - Audio Engineering Society