Recent developments in neural network-based speech enhancement ask for a robust subjective metric that can be used for comparing performance of a different noise suppression algorithms (for non-stationary noises), that would closely match costly and time-consuming subjective user tests. The article describes results of a comparison between subjective scores obtained using MUSHRA methodology vs. automated evaluation with objective metrics i.e. POLQA, 3QUEST, STOI & ESTOI, on a set of recordings processed by 2 different denoising algorithms for close & far speaker distance. Correlation coefficient is calculated between subjective scores and examined metrics. The results are based on recordings simulated using an in-house simulation toolchain, based on impulse responses from actual laptop device used in low reverb quiet room.
Click to purchase paper as a non-member or you can login as an AES member to see more options.
No AES members have commented on this paper yet.
To be notified of new comments on this paper you can
subscribe to this RSS feed.
Forum users should login to see additional options.
If you are not yet an AES member and have something important to say about this paper then we urge you to join the AES today and make your voice heard. You can join online today by clicking here.
