A comparison between computerized techniques for measuring STI and RASTI is made. The measurements are made under idealized controlled conditions and highlight the differences in results that can occur. The results show that while good agreement between the techniques can be achieved, weighting factors and time windowing can lead to significant errors.
Click to purchase paper as a non-member or you can login as an AES member to see more options.
No AES members have commented on this paper yet.
To be notified of new comments on this paper you can
subscribe to this RSS feed.
Forum users should login to see additional options.
If you are not yet an AES member and have something important to say about this paper then we urge you to join the AES today and make your voice heard. You can join online today by clicking here.
