A study was undertaken to compare three immersive sound capture techniques optimized for acoustic music recording, within the context of binaural audio reproduction. 3D audio stimuli derived from 9-channel (4+5+0) recordings of a solo piano were binaurally rendered and presented to listeners over headphones. Subjects compared these stimuli in terms of several salient perceptual auditory attributes. Results of the double-blind listening test found no significant differences between two of the sound capture techniques, “spaced” and “near-coincident,” for the perceptual auditory attributes “envelopment,” “naturalness of sound scene,” and “naturalness of timbre.” The spaced technique, however, was shown to create a larger virtual image of the sound source than the near-coincident technique. The coincident technique was found to create an immersive sound scene that occupies a different perceptual space from the other two techniques, delivering less envelopment and naturalness.
Authors:
Howie, Will; Martin, Dennis; Kamekawa, Toru; Kelly, Jack; King, Richard
Affiliations:
CBC/Radio–Canada, Vancouver, BC, Canada; McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada; Tokyo University of the Arts,Tokyo, Japan(See document for exact affiliation information.)
AES Convention:
150 (May 2021)
Paper Number:
10455
Publication Date:
May 24, 2021
Subject:
Reproduction: 3D Audio
Click to purchase paper as a non-member or you can login as an AES member to see more options.
No AES members have commented on this paper yet.
To be notified of new comments on this paper you can subscribe to this RSS feed. Forum users should login to see additional options.
If you are not yet an AES member and have something important to say about this paper then we urge you to join the AES today and make your voice heard. You can join online today by clicking here.