In this study, efficiency of different methods of whispered speech speaker recognition have been compared. Whispered speech as one of the voice disguises is causing a lot of difficulties in speaker identification. During examination of both methods authors were looking for key factors of speaker recognition in both methods. Both methods were tested with and without normal voice as a reference sample. Non-acoustic circumstances as time and costs were considered during comparison as well.

Authors: Goliasz, Krzysztof; Luczynski, Michal
Affiliation: Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Wroclaw, Poland
AES Convention: 142 (May 2017) Paper Number: 9718
Publication Date: May 11, 2017
Subject: Posters: Analysis, Coding, and Hearing

Click to purchase paper as a non-member or you can login as an AES member to see more options.

No AES members have commented on this paper yet.

Subscribe to this discussion

To be notified of new comments on this paper you can subscribe to this RSS feed. Forum users should login to see additional options.

Start a discussion!

If you would like to start a discussion about this paper and are an AES member then you can login here:
Username:
Password:

If you are not yet an AES member and have something important to say about this paper then we urge you to join the AES today and make your voice heard. You can join online today by clicking here.