Community

AES Convention Papers Forum

In Situ Subjective and Objective Acoustic Seal Performance Tests for Insert Earphones

Document Thumbnail

Insert–type earphones are unique in that when tightly sealed in an ear canal, they have the potential to deliver sound down to 20 Hz and below. In practice however, obtaining an extended low frequency response is challenged by a difficulty for users to achieve an adequate seal between the ear canal and the insert earphone [1], [2], [3]. Achieving such a seal is not intuitive to users new to insert earphones. Measurements made on actual earphones show that a leak as small as .5 mm in diameter and 2.5 mm long can result in a reduction of bass at 50 Hz of approximately 15 dB. Such a loss results when the leak is present, since the actual volume seen by the transducer at low frequencies is considerably greater than for higher frequencies, where the impedance of the leak becomes much higher in value. The result is a very perceptible and often disappointing reduction in bass performance. This paper describes two methods by which a user can confirm the level of acoustic seal obtained for a given combination of transducer, ear tip / ear mold and ear canal by subjective and objective means. The subjective method is based on an experimental observation that even with a poor seal the output of insert earphones at 500 Hz, is quite independent of seal quality. By consequently subjectively comparing the output of a recorded tone at 500 Hz to one at 50 Hz adjusted to be equal in perceived level based on ISO 226:2003 equal-loudness contours, one can confirm a good seal when the levels tend to subjectively match. The objective method involves fitting an insert earphone with a miniature flat pressure microphone into the sound port, and observing the “in canal” frequency response by means of spectral analysis, while the earphone is in use. As the seal quality improves the measured low frequency response approaches that of the coupler response of the earphone as measured with a high quality seal.

Authors:
Affiliations:
AES Convention: Paper Number:
Publication Date:
Subject:

Click to purchase paper as a non-member or you can login as an AES member to see more options.

No AES members have commented on this paper yet.

Subscribe to this discussion

RSS Feed To be notified of new comments on this paper you can subscribe to this RSS feed. Forum users should login to see additional options.

Start a discussion!

If you would like to start a discussion about this paper and are an AES member then you can login here:
Username:
Password:

If you are not yet an AES member and have something important to say about this paper then we urge you to join the AES today and make your voice heard. You can join online today by clicking here.

AES - Audio Engineering Society