Simulation on loudspeaker drivers require a conventional fully coupled vibroacoustic model to capture both the effect of the loading mass of the air on the moving parts and the geometric topology of the cone, dust cap, and surround. An accurate vibroacoustic model can be time-consuming to solve, especially in 3-D. In practical applications, this results in poor efficiency concerning the decision-making process to move on to the next simulation model. To overcome this the loudspeaker designer can use either a near-to-far-field transformation or post-process structural only results via the Rayleigh integral to reduce or totally eliminate the computationally demanding open air domain in front of the speaker. These simplifications come with the cost of a frequency dependent inaccuracy. This paper compares for three different drivers (a totally flat, a concave cone, and a convex dome) the efficiency and accuracy of a conventional fully-coupled vibroacoustic model where the measurement point is included in the computational FEA domain with respectively, a reduced air domain model having the measurement point outside the computational FEA domain obtained by a near-to-far-field transformation, and a model relying on the structural only Rayleigh integral post-processing.
Click to purchase paper as a non-member or you can login as an AES member to see more options.
No AES members have commented on this paper yet.
To be notified of new comments on this paper you can
subscribe to this RSS feed.
Forum users should login to see additional options.
If you are not yet an AES member and have something important to say about this paper then we urge you to join the AES today and make your voice heard. You can join online today by clicking here.
