Parametric optimisation techniques are compared in their abilities to elicit parameter settings for sound synthesis algorithms which cause them to emit sounds as similar as possible to target sounds. A hill climber, a genetic algorithm, a neural net and a data driven approach are compared. The error metric used is the Euclidean distance in MFCC feature space. This metric is justified on the basis of its success in previous work. The genetic algorithm offers the best results with the FM and subtractive test synthesizers but the hill climber and data driven approach also offer strong performance. The concept of sound synthesis error surfaces, allowing the detailed description of sound synthesis space, is introduced. The error surface for an FM synthesizer is described and suggestions are made as to the resolution required to effectively represent these surfaces. This information is used to inform future plans for algorithm improvements.

Authors: Roth, Martin; Yee-King, Matthew
Affiliations: Goldsmiths, University of London, London, UK; Reality Jockey, Ltd., London, UK(See document for exact affiliation information.)
AES Convention: 130 (May 2011) Paper Number: 8418
Publication Date: May 13, 2011
Subject: Audio Signal Processing and Analysis

Click to purchase paper as a non-member or you can login as an AES member to see more options.

No AES members have commented on this paper yet.

Subscribe to this discussion

To be notified of new comments on this paper you can subscribe to this RSS feed. Forum users should login to see additional options.

Start a discussion!

If you would like to start a discussion about this paper and are an AES member then you can login here:
Username:
Password:

If you are not yet an AES member and have something important to say about this paper then we urge you to join the AES today and make your voice heard. You can join online today by clicking here.