This paper results from a case study comparing the relative cost effectiveness of three modelling techniques applied to a small acoustic space such as a car cabin. The techniques considered are finite element analysis, analytical solutions, and the quasi-analytical ray-trace or image method. A simple test-case is used to compare solution times and accuracy.
Author:
Harris, Neil
Affiliation:
NXT
AES Convention:
122 (May 2007)
Paper Number:
7146
Publication Date:
May 1, 2007
Session Subject:
Room and Architectural Acoustics; Sound Reinforcement
Click to purchase paper as a non-member or you can login as an AES member to see more options.
No AES members have commented on this paper yet.
To be notified of new comments on this paper you can subscribe to this RSS feed. Forum users should login to see additional options.
If you are not yet an AES member and have something important to say about this paper then we urge you to join the AES today and make your voice heard. You can join online today by clicking here.