Several recording techniques and equipment are used in outdoor and indoor recordings for Motion Picture. The choices are usually characterized from subjectivity and technical limitations irrelevant to the desired final sound quality. Our goal is to present results of comparative recordings in order to give answers to every-day-practice problems that arise. Overhead and underneath booming and the use of wireless microphones are compared through time and frequency analysis.
Authors:
Goussios, Christos A.; Kalliris, George M.; Sevastiadis, Christos V.
Affiliations:
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering; Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Department of Film Studies; Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Department of Journalism and Mass Communication(See document for exact affiliation information.)
AES Convention:
122 (May 2007)
Paper Number:
7041
Publication Date:
May 1, 2007
Subject:
Audio Recording and Reproduction
Click to purchase paper as a non-member or you can login as an AES member to see more options.
No AES members have commented on this paper yet.
To be notified of new comments on this paper you can subscribe to this RSS feed. Forum users should login to see additional options.
If you are not yet an AES member and have something important to say about this paper then we urge you to join the AES today and make your voice heard. You can join online today by clicking here.