AES Convention Papers Forum

Comparing Ambisonic Microphones—Part 2

(Subscribe to this discussion)

Document Thumbnail

This paper presents some further experiments devised to assess the performance of an expanded number of commercially available Ambisonic microphones. The subjective timbral and spatial quality of five microphones (Soundfield MKV, Core Sound TetraMic, Sennheiser Ambeo, MH Acoustics Eigenmike, and Zoom H2N) is assessed using listening tests and a recording of an acoustic quartet. Localization accuracy is assessed using an objective directional analysis and recordings from a spherical loudspeaker array. Intensity vectors are extracted from 25 critical frequency bands of the Bark scale and used to compute the angle to the source location. Significant differences were found between microphones with the Soundfield MKV and Eigenmike producing the best results in terms of timbral quality and localization respectively.

AES Convention: Paper Number:
Publication Date:

Click to purchase paper as a non-member or you can login as an AES member to see more options.

(Comment on this paper)

Comments on this paper

Enda Bates
Enda Bates

Comment posted June 19, 2017 @ 16:50:21 UTC (Comment permalink)

The recordings used in the listening test described in this paper are now available to download from the link below.

Subscribe to this discussion

RSS Feed To be notified of new comments on this paper you can subscribe to this RSS feed. Forum users should login to see additional options.

Join this discussion!

If you would like to contribute to the discussion about this paper and are an AES member then you can login here:

If you are not yet an AES member and have something important to say about this paper then we urge you to join the AES today and make your voice heard. You can join online today by clicking here.

AES - Audio Engineering Society