A multi-phase subjective experiment evaluating six commercially available binaural audio renderers was carried out. This paper presents the methodology, evaluation criteria, and main ?ndings of the tests that assessed perceived sound quality of the renderers. Subjects appraised a number of speci?c sound quality attributes—timbral balance, clarity, naturalness, spaciousness, and dialogue intelligibility—and ranked, in terms of preference, the renderers for a set of music and movie stimuli presented over headphones. Results indicated that differences between the perceived quality and preference for a renderer are discernible. Binaural renderer performance was also found to be highly content-dependent, with signi?cant interactions between renderers and individual stimuli being found, making it dif?cult to determine an “optimal” renderer for all settings.

Authors: Reardon, Gregory; Genovese, Andrea; Zalles, Gabriel; Flanagan, Patrick; Roginska, Agnieszka
Affiliations: New York University, New York, NY, USA; THX, San Francisco, CA, USA(See document for exact affiliation information.)
AES Conference: 2018 AES International Conference on Audio for Virtual and Augmented Reality (August 2018)
Paper Number: P2-5
Publication Date: August 11, 2018

Click to purchase paper as a non-member or you can login as an AES member to see more options.

No AES members have commented on this paper yet.

Subscribe to this discussion

To be notified of new comments on this paper you can subscribe to this RSS feed. Forum users should login to see additional options.

Start a discussion!

If you would like to start a discussion about this paper and are an AES member then you can login here:
Username:
Password:

If you are not yet an AES member and have something important to say about this paper then we urge you to join the AES today and make your voice heard. You can join online today by clicking here.