To improve the quality of noisy speech recordings, sound engineers have at their disposal a variety of signal processing techniques. These techniques often have a wide range of parameters which need to be adjusted to obtain optimal processing results. This paper investigates the difficulty of finding the best parameter settings for a commercial noise-reduction system. In a first experiment, operators adjusted the settings of a particular system while attempting to maximise the intelligibility of speech corrupted with babble noise at different signal-to-noise ratios. Their preferences were then evaluated in a listening experiment - showing that their chosen settings actually reduced intelligibility compared to the original signal. In another experiment a range of parameter settings for the same system were evaluated using both listeners and an intelligibility model based on a speech envelope distortion measure. Although the measure is imperfect, it is still able to predict optimal parameter settings better than the human operators.

Authors: Hilkhuysen, Gaston; Huckvale, Mark
Affiliation: Univerisity College London, London, UK
AES Conference: 39th International Conference: Audio Forensics: Practices and Challenges (June 2010)
Paper Number: 3-2
Publication Date: June 17, 2010
Subject: Audio Forensics: Enhancement of Noisy Recordings

Click to purchase paper as a non-member or you can login as an AES member to see more options.

No AES members have commented on this paper yet.

Subscribe to this discussion

To be notified of new comments on this paper you can subscribe to this RSS feed. Forum users should login to see additional options.

Start a discussion!

If you would like to start a discussion about this paper and are an AES member then you can login here:
Username:
Password:

If you are not yet an AES member and have something important to say about this paper then we urge you to join the AES today and make your voice heard. You can join online today by clicking here.